Open Access

CpG Immunotherapy in Chenopodium album sensitized mice: The comparison of IFN-gamma, IL-10 and IgE responses in intranasal and subcutaneous administrations

  • Tahereh Mousavi1Email author,
  • Nader Tajik1,
  • Maziar Moradi2 and
  • Masoomeh Fallah Radjabzadeh1
Clinical and Molecular Allergy20086:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7961-6-10

Received: 13 April 2008

Accepted: 17 September 2008

Published: 17 September 2008

Abstract

Background

Mucosal-based immunotherapy has been already used as an alternative form of allergen delivery. In asthma, the poor success rate of immune modulation could be a consequence of inadequate immune modulation in the airways. Previously, we have found that subcutaneous (S.C) co-administration of a homemade allergenic extract from Chenopodium album (Ch.a) pollen and Guanine-Cytosine containing deoxynucleotides (CpG-ODNs) is effective to prevent the inflammatory responses in mouse. In this study we used CpG/Ch.a for immunotherapy of Ch.a-induced asthma and compared the intranasal (I.N) and S.C routes of administration concerning IFN-γ, IL-10 and total IgE responses.

Methods

Ch.a sensitized mice were treated intranasaly or subcutaneously using CpG and Ch.a. extract. IFN-γ, IL-10 and total IgE were measured in supernatant culture of splenocytes and bronchoalveolor lavage (BAL) fluids by ELISA. Student's t test was used in the analysis of the results obtained from the test and control mice.

Results

We found that I.N administration of CpG/Ch.a in sensitized mice significantly increased the production of systemic and mucosal IFN-γ and IL-10 compared to phosphate buffered saline (PBS), Ch.a alone and control ODNs treated sensitized mice (P ≤ 0.001). On the other hand, S.C. route induced the systemic and mucosal IFN-γ in the lower levels than in I.N one, and failed to increase systemic IL-10 induction (P = 0.06). Total serum IgE in CpG/Ch.a treated mice in both routes showed significant decreases compared to three control groups (P ≤ 0.01). The amounts of IgE in BAL fluids were not measurable in all groups.

Conclusion

According to the results of this experiment we concluded that immunotherapy via the I.N co-administration of CpG/Ch.a in comparison with S.C route is more effective to stimulate the mucosal and regulatory responses in Ch.a induced asthma.

Background

Immunomodulatory agents and their applications in allergic diseases have become one of the most investigating subjects in recent years [1, 2]. Because of their potentials in immune response deviations, CpG-ODNs are used to shift immune response toward Th1 and regulatory cytokine induction. These cytokines can ultimately lead to prevention or reduction of pathologic features in asthma and other allergic conditions [3, 4]. There have been many reports on beneficial properties of CpG motifs used in combination with different antigens from all over the world [58]. Furthermore, the route of administration is an attractive subject among these studies [9, 10].

In the present study we aimed to compare a number of the immunomodulatory effects of I.N and S.C co-administration of CpG motifs in combination with allergen of Chenopodium album (Ch.a) in Ch.a sensitized mice. The antigen used in this study was a crude allergenic extract prepared from Ch.a pollen which is one of the most common allergenic agents in Iran. Previously we had demonstrated the potentials of this extract to develop an experimentally induced asthma in mouse. We also showed the preventive effects of CpG motifs administered with Ch.a extract at the sensitization stage [11, 12].

Since the usage of adjuvant like CpG motifs for mucosal immunotherapy was successful [13], we aimed to compare the potentials of I.N. and S.C administrations of CpG/allergen in mouse model of asthma. In order to compare the effects of different administration route of CpG, we selected a number of immunological parameters such as IFN-γ, IL-10 and IgE. Indeed, the measurement of immune responses regarding TH1 and regulatory activities could be the indicators for evaluating and choosing the appropriate route for CpG/allergen co-administration.

Methods

Antigen

allergen extract was prepared according to previously reported procedure [14]. Briefly, the pollen grains collected from the flowering Ch.a. plant were immediately vacuum dried at 35°C, purified up to 98% through sieving, defatted with acetone, dried and extracted in PBS (0.02 M, pH = 7.4) overnight at 4°C. The filtered solution then was dialyzed against PBS and sterilized by 0.22 μm filtration.

Oligonucleotides

The CpG-ODNs contain two CpG motifs (ODN 1826) and control ODNs lacking CpG motifs (ODN, 1826 Control) were purchased from In vivogen, USA. The complete sequences for CPG-ODNs and ODNs control are as follows respectively: 5'-tcc atg acg ttc ctg acg tt-3' and 5'-tcc atg agc ttc ctg agc tt-3'

Animal immunization

Inbred female BALB/c mice aged in 4–6 weeks were purchased from Razi institute in Iran. All experiments complied with the requirements of the animal care committee of Iran University of medical sciences. Using previously reported protocols [[11, 15] and [16]], Mice were immunized on day 1 and 7 IP with 50 μg Ch.a precipitated in 4 mg aluminium hydroxide in 200 μl PBS and followed by aerosol challenge of 1% Ch.a (1 mg Ch.a extract in 100 ml PBS) on days 14 and 16 for 30 min.

Immunotherapy

For treatment, sensitized mice were divided into I.N and S.C groups. Each group was then randomly subdivided into four (10 in each) as following:

CpG/Ch.a = sensitized mice treated with Ch.a and CpG mixture (50 μg/10 μg respectively). Ch.a = sensitized mice treated with Ch.a alone (50 μg). PBS = sensitized mice treated with PBS. ODN/Ch.a = sensitized mice treated with non CpG ODN control (50 μg/10 μg respectively). I.N treatment was done on day 19, 26 and 33 in I.N group as mentioned above. S.C treatment was done on day 19 and 26 for mice which were considered as S.C group. Finally, all groups of mice were secondly exposed to aerosol allergen (1%) on day 40 and 47 for 30 min.

Sample preparation

Blood samples were collected from all mice two days after the final antigen challenge on day 49 and separated sera were stored at -20°C for IgE assays. Spleens were also excised on day 49 and single cell suspensions were cultured in complete medium (5 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI, 10% FCS, 100 U/ml pen/strep) in the presence of 50 μg/ml of allergen for 72 hrs at 37°C in 5% Co2. Cell culture supernatants prepared from all mice were stored at – 80°C for cytokine assays.

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were prepared according to previously reported methods [11, 12]. Briefly, therachea was canulated and BAL fluids were obtained by lavaging lungs with two 0.5 ml of cold PBS.

Cytokine assay

IL-10 and IFN-γ were measured in splenocytes culture media and BAL Fluids using mouse IL-10 ELISA set, cat. no. 555252 and mouse IFN-γ ELISA set, cat. no. 5518660 respectively (BD Biosciences, USA). Tests were done according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

IgE assay-ELISA was performed for total serum IgE assay using Becton Dickinson opteia mouse IgE set, cat no.5552448, (BD, USA). According to the manufacturer the lower detection limits of the assay system was 2 ng/ml.

Statistics

Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Each experiment was repeated twice. Student's t-test was performed for statistic analysis.

Results

Our results demonstrated elevated levels of IFN-γ production from splenocytes after both I.N and S.C treatment with CpG/Ch.a compared to Ch.a alone, PBS and CpG/ODN controls (P ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, as presented in Figure 1(a) IFN-γ production from splenocytes in I.N treated mice both in CpG/Ch.a and in ODN/Ch.a treated mice are significantly higher than those in Ch.a alone and PBS treated mice.
Figure 1

The comparison of cytokines and antibody levels. The mean values of systemic and local concentrations of cytokines and IgE antibody measured by ELISA in S.C and I.N CpG/Ch.a treated asthmatic mice in comparison with Ch.a, PBS and ODN treated controls. (a): IFN-γ produced by splenocytes in CpG/Ch.a treated mice are increased in both routes of administrations, (b): IL-10 induced by splenocytes suppressed in S.C and enhanced in I.N routes, (c and d): IFN-γ and IL-10 in BAL fluids are equally increased in both S.C and I.N treated mice with CpG/Ch.a. (e): total serum IgE decreased in mice treated with CpG/Ch.a through I.N or S.C routes. P values in all analysis are as ≤ 0.01.

Respecting IL-10, I.N treatment with CpG/Ch.a showed significant increases in systemic IL-10 levels compared to all controls (P ≤ 0.001). But, the mean systemic concentrations of this cytokine in S.C treated mice with CpG/Ch.a were lower in comparison with those in Ch.a and PBS controls, and higher than those in ODN/Ch.a controls (P ≤ 0.01) as shown in figure 1(b).

In order to analyze the effect of I.N versus S.C administration of CpG in mucosal responses we measured the IL-10 and IFN-γ in BAL fluids of different groups of mice. We found that IFN-γ and IL-10 were both increased in BAL fluids and results demonstrated that independent to administration route, CpG/Ch.a treatment significantly increased the production of these cytokines (P ≤ 0.001). As shown in figure 1(c) and 1(d), the route of administration did not affect the production of cytokines in BAL fluids and no significant changes were shown in cytokine levels between either route of administration (P = 0.06).

Total serum IgE in CpG/Ch.a treated mice decreased significantly compared to control groups independent to administration routes (P ≤ 0.01). But the amount of IgE was not detectable in BAL fluids as shown in figure 1(e).

Discussion

At the present time there are many reports on CpG-ODNs used with different allergens [17, 18]. But, there is no report in the literature regarding the mechanisms for immunomodulatory effects of CpG-ODNs on Ch.a induced asthma. In this study we compared the effectiveness of CpG components for I.N and S.C immunotherapy of mice sensitized by Ch.a, allergenic extract. This extract was made from one of the common allergenic pollen in our country. For this goal we evaluated a number of systemic and local immunomodulatory effects of CpG motifs in Ch.a induced asthma. We measured IFN-γ, IL-10 and IgE as the Th1, T-reg and Th2 like responses, respectively. In consistence with other reports [6, 10], we found in our study the increased IFN-γ production in splenocytes culture supernatants as well as in BAL fluids after CpG/Ch.a therapy. These results indicated the potentials of CpG motifs to enhance the systemic and local Th1 like responses in Ch.a sensitized mice. However, concerning IFN-γ production, our results indicated that I.N administration of CPG motifs was more effective than S.C route. Thus, according to a number of studies [19, 20], we can suggest that this effect could be attributed to expression of TLR-9 and also the presence of dendritic cells in the nasal epithelium.

Recently, induction of IL-10 has been proposed as an important mechanism of immunotherapy [15, 21]. Similarly, our data showed that I.N treatment of mice increased the systemic and mucosal levels of IL-10 as a regulatory cytokine. However, our results indicated that S.C administration of CpG/Ch.a enhanced the local elevation of this cytokine but failed to increase the systemic IL-10. Interestingly, we found not only the elevation, but also the reduction in systemic IL-10 in S.C treated mice. This effect indicates the potentials of I.N but not S.C route to stimulate both the spleen and lung lymphocytes to produce IL-10 cytokine. Therefore, based on the study of Macubas et. al [13] which reported that respiratory tolerance is mediated by IL-10 producing dendtitic cells in lung leading to development of T-reg cells, we can suggest that I.N administration of CpG/Ch.a may activate the T-reg populations in lung and spleen of Ch.a sensitized mice. This result could indicate the advantage of I.N route of administration in CpG/Ch.a therapy of asthmatic mice. On the other hand, we found the significant increases in IL-10 levels after I.N therapy not only with CPG, but also with non-CPG containing ODNs. These effects for CpG negative control were not observed in S.C. administration route. According to Sano et al [22] who observed that non-CpG ODNs trigger Th2-biased immune stimulation, it seems that immunoregulatory effects of DNA components could be partly due to development of T-reg responses, especially when they are used through mucosal surfaces. Considering the reports about the participation of regulatory cells and molecules in the down modulation of immune responses in asthma [21], we suggest that intranasaly co-administration of allergenic extract from Ch.a pollen and CpG motifs in Ch.a induced asthma activates the systemic and local IL-10 producing T-reg cells. However, further studies are necessary to show that the T-reg cells in the lung are responsible for the induction of tolerance through the I.N administration of CpG/Ch.a. in sensitized mice.

Regarding TH2 responses, our study indicated a decrease in total serum IgE following the CpG immunotherapy. In contrast to Mo JH [17] we and Suzuki et al [23] detected the significant declines in IgE antibodies after CpG therapy. As the IgE detection in BAL fluids was impossible, we would suggest the further evaluation of local Th2 responses such as eosinophilia in the BAL or airway hyper responsiveness.

On the other hand, In the case of route of administration and chemical component of allergen in CPG-based immunotherapy, considering other reports studding on other allergic conditions than on asthma [24], and also according to Suzuki et al [23] reporting the usefulness of CpG-ODNs in intranasal administration for control of allergic rhinitis to Japanese cedar, we showed that for immunotherapy of Ch.a sensitizes mice, nasal route which is the natural way to induce asthma could be more effective than S.C one. Moreover, in consistence with other reports indicating the advantage of allergenic proteins over peptide epitops in immunotherapy [25], our study indicated that the crude allergenic protein which is simply prepared from Ch.a pollens is a suitable material for in vivo application in mice.

Conclusion

Taken together, treatment of Ch.a induced asthma in mice via the I.N co-administration of CpG motifs with a crude extract of Ch.a pollen would be very effective compared to S.C route of administration. However, the further studies are needed to indicate the beneficial effects of this protocol in the field of human immunotherapy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study is financially supported by Iran University of medical sciences. We wish to thank Dr Nazanin Mojtabavi for her valuable helps and critical review of the paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Immunology, Iran University of medical sciences
(2)
Department of Social Medicine, Iran university of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Doina M, Racilam JN, Kline M: Perspectives in asthma: Molecular use of microbial products in asthma prevention and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005, 116 (6): 1202-1206. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.050View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jain VV, Kline JN: CpG DNA: immunomodulation and remodeling of the asthmatic airway. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004, 4 (9): 1533-40. 10.1517/14712598.4.9.1533View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ikeda RK, Nayar J, Cho JY, Miller M, Rodriguez M, Rosa DS: Resolution of airway inflammation following ovalbumin inhalation. Comparison of ISS DNA and corticosteroids. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003, 28: 139-142. 10.1165/rcmb.4853.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Krieg AM: CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002, 20: 709-760. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064842View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu N, Ohnishi N, Ni L, Akira S, Bacon KB: CpG directly induces T-bet expression and inhibits IgG1 and IgE switching in B cells. Nat Immunol. 2003, 4: 687-693. 10.1038/ni941View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Linghua Z, Xingshan T, Fengzhen Z: In vivo oral administration effects of various Oligodeoxynucleotides containing synthetic immunostimulatory motifs in the immune response to psodorabied attenuated virus vaccine in newborn piglets. Vaccine. 2008, 26 (2): 224-233. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.058View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Klinman DM: Therapeutic applications of CpG-containing Oligodeoxynucleotides. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1998, 8 (2): 181-184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hussain I, Jain VV, Kitagaki K, Businga TR, O'Shaughnessy P, Kline JN: Modulation of murine allergic rhinosinusitis by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. J Laryngoscope. 2002, 112 (10): 1819-26. 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Broide DH, Stachnick G, Castaneda D, Nayar J, Miller M: Systemic administration of immunostimulatory DNA sequences mediates reversible inhibition of Th2 responses in a mouse model of asthma. J Clin Immunol. 2001, 21: 175-182. 10.1023/A:1011078930363View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jain VV, Businga TR, Kitagaki K, George CL, O'Shaughnessy PT, Kline JN: Mucosal immunotherapy with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides reverses a murine model of chronic asthma induced by repeated antigen exposure. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003, 285 (5): L1137-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mousavi T, Asadi N, Tebiyanian M: Study of Chenopodium album allergenic extract to induce allergic asthma in a murine model. Iranian Journal of Immunology. 2005, 2 (3): 56-59.Google Scholar
  12. Mousavi T, Salek Moghadam A, Falak R, Tebyanian M: Co-administration of CpG Oligonucleotides and Chenopodium album extract reverse IgG2a/IgG1 ratios and increase IFN-gamma and IL-10 production in a murine model of asthma. Iran J Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2008, 7 (1): 1-6.Google Scholar
  13. Macaubas C, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT: Respiratory tolerance in the protection against asthma. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2003, 2 (2): 175-86. 10.2174/1568010033484304View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mousavi T, Asadi N, Movahedi M: The comparison of conventional and WHO methods for protein determination of allergic extract. Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. 2003, 2 (2): 107-9.Google Scholar
  15. Kunihiko K, Vipul VJ, Thomas RB, Iflikhar H, Joel NK: Immunomodulatory effects of CpG oligos on established Th2 responses. Clinical and Laboratory Immunoll. 2002, 9 (6): 1260-1269. 10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1260-1269.2002.Google Scholar
  16. Wild JS, Sigounas A, Sur N, Siddiqui M, Alam R, Kurimoto M, Sur S: IFN-γ – inducing factor increases allergic sensitization, serum IgE, Th2 cytokines and airway eosinophilia in a mouse model of allergic asthma. The Journal of Immunology. 2000, 164: 2701-2710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mo JH, Park SW, Rhee CS, Takabayashi K, Lee SS, Quan SH, Kim IS: Suppression of allergic response by CpG motif-house-dust mite conjugate in animal model of allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol. 2006, 20 (2): 212-218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Santeliz JV, Nest GV, Traquina P, Larsen E, Wills-Karp M: Amb a 1-linked CpG oligodeoxynucleotides reverse established airway hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002, 109: 455-462. 10.1067/mai.2002.122156View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fransson M, Benson M, Adner M, Bjornesson S, Erjefalt J, Uddman R, cardell LO: Expression of Toll-like receptor 9 in nose, peripheral blood and bone marrow during symptomatic allergic rhinitis. Respir Rec. 8: 17-10.1186/1465-9921-8-17. 2007, feb 38Google Scholar
  20. Hartmann E, Graefe H, Hopert A, Pries R, Rothenfusser S, Poeek H, Mack B: Analysis of plasmacytoid and myeloid dendritic cells in nasal epithelium. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13 (11): 1278-86. 10.1128/CVI.00172-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Scott MR, Justice JP, Bradfield JF, Enright E, Sigounas A, Sur S: IL-10 reduces Th2 cytokine production and eosinophilia but augments airway reactivity in allergic mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000, 278: L667-L674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sano K, Shirota H, Terui T, Hattori T, Tamura G: Oligodeoxynucleotides without CpG motifs work as adjuvant for the induction of the differentiation in a sequence-independent manner. J Immunol. 2003, 170 (5): 2367-2373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Suzuki M, Matsumoto T, Ohta N, Min WP, Murakami S: Intranasal CpG DNA therapy during allergen exposure in allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007, 136 (2): 246-251. 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.09.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Inoue J, Yotsumoto S, Sakamoto T, Tsuchiya S, Aramaki Y: Changes in immune responses to mite antigen sentisized through barrier-disrupted skin with CPG-Oligo in mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006, 29 (2): 385-387. 10.1248/bpb.29.385View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Suzuki M, Ohta N, Min WP, Matsumoto T, Min R, Zhang X, Toida K, Murakami S: Immunotherapy with CpG DNA conjugated with T-cell epitope of an allergenic Cry J 2 protein is useful for control of allergic conditions in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7 (1): 46-54. 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.08.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mousavi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement