- Open Access
Risk of anaphylaxis in patients with large local reactions to hymenoptera stings: a retrospective and prospective study
© Pucci et al. 2015
- Received: 25 June 2015
- Accepted: 10 August 2015
- Published: 9 November 2015
In the few studies available, the risk of developing systemic reactions (SR) to hymenoptera stings in patients with previous large local reactions (LLRs) to stings ranges from 0 to 7 %. We evaluated both retrospectively and prospectively the risk of SRs in patients with LLRs to stings.
An overall number of 477 patients, 396 with an SR as the first manifestation of allergy and 81 with a history of only LLRs after hymenoptera stings, were included in the study. All patients had clinical history and allergy testing (skin tests and/or specific IgE) indicative of allergy to venom of only one kind of Hymenoptera. Of the 81 patient with LLRs, 53 were followed-up for 3 years by annual control visits, while the 396 patients with SR were evaluated retrospectively.
Among the 396 patients with an SR, only 17 (4.2 %) had had a previous LLR as debut of allergy, after an history of normal local reactions to Hymenoptera stings. All the 81 patients with a history of only LLRs had previously had at least two LLRs, with an overall number of 238 stings and no SR. Among the 53 patients who were prospectively evaluated we found that 31 of them (58.3 %) were restung by the same type of insect, with an overall number of 59 stings, presenting only LLRs and no SR.
Our findings confirm that patients with repeated LLRs to stings had no risk of SR, while a single LLR does not exclude such risk. This has to be considered in the management of patients with LLRs.
- Hymenoptera sting
- Large local reaction
- Systemic reaction
Large local reactions (LLRs) to Hymenoptera stings, that are defined as skin reactions around the site of the sting characterized by edema, erythema and itching, with a diameter greater than 10 cm, are much more common than systemic reactions (SRs) . In fact, prevalence of LLRs as high as 26.4 and 38 % were reported in the general population  and in beekeepers , respectively, compared with a mean prevalence of SRs to stings of around 3 % in adults and 1 % in children . The most relevant medical aspect of LLRs is the natural history, and in particular the risk of developing an SR to a further sting of the same kind of insect. The first studies on this issue date back to 1984, when Graft et al.  and Mauriello et al.  published their observations on 54 children and 18 adults, respectively. The rate of SR following a history of LLRs detected in these studies was very similar, corresponding to 4 % in children  and 5 % in adults . By these results, the authors concluded that patients with LLRs tend to repeat such reactions, and that the risk of anaphylaxis is too small to warrant venom immunotherapy. Further studies were published only 20 years later. In 2004, Golden et al.  reported in 44 children with LLRs a 7 % rate of SRs, while in 2005 a survey from Spain showed that no SR to subsequent stings was developed by 23 patients with LLRs during a 4-year follow-up . In 2009, a review on the issue suggested that further studies were needed on the natural history of LLRs, also based on authors’ personal observation of a risk for SRs in patients with LLRs higher than reported .
We aimed this study at evaluating, both retrospectively and prospectively, the risk of SRs subsequent to LLRs in a large population of patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy.
Characteristics of the two groups of patients
Mean age (years)
Age range (years)
Group 1 (retrospective, SRs) 396 patients
180 Vespula spp.
114 Polistes spp.
36 Vespa crabro
66 Apis mellifera
Group 2 (prospective, LLRs) 81 patients
38 Vespula spp.
33 Polistes spp.
10 Apis mellifera
Results of the prospective part of the study
No. of patients with LLR
Patients followed for 3 years
No of LLR (pts)
No of SR
LLRs to Hymenoptera stings may be IgE-mediated or not. Green et al. in 1980 reported that, in 22 patients who had LLRs from Hymenoptera stings, approximately half of them had venom-specific IgE antibodies, and that no correlations could be found between the presence of venom-specific IgE and age, sex, sting location, atopic history, or prior stings . This suggested to the authors that after an LLR from an insect sting patients must be individually assessed for the presence of venom-specific IgE and considered for specific immunotherapy. Subsequent studies focused the interest on IgE-mediated LLRs and particularly on the risk to develop SRs after an LLR. Four studies on this issue are available thus far. The first two studies have similar results, with a rate of SRs of 4 % in children  and 5 % in adults . Instead, contrasting data were reported in the two more recent prospective studies, with a rate of SRs of 7 % in children  but no SR at all in a group of patients including both children and adults . The major issues concerning these studies are the known limitations of retrospective studies and the low number of patients in the prospective studies. Concerning the first issue, the biases which can negatively impact the reliability of this type of study include the selection bias, the difficulty in assessing the temporal relationship and control of outcomes, and the need of large sample size for rare outcomes . In the case of allergic reactions to insect stings, the psychological characteristics of patients may influence their decision to undergo a medical evaluation, being possible that patients claim such evaluation after an LLR or feel it unnecessary after an SR. These bias weaken the findings of retrospective studies, while the prospective evaluation allows more reliable observations. Still, a small number of patients makes it unlikely for statistical reasons to achieve a sound consistency also for prospective studies. In particular, the contrasting outcome of the two prospective studies in patients with LLRs—7 vs. 0 %—were observed in two groups of 44 children and 23 children and adults, respectively. In the prospective part of our study we included 81 adult patients with at least two LLRs, but only 53 were evaluated for 3 years, by annual control visits, 31 of them being re-stung with no SR, that confirms the finding by Fernandez et al. . Concerning the retrospective part of the study, in the 396 patients with an SR only 4.2 % had had a previous single LLR as debut of allergy, that is the identical rate observed in the study by Mauriello et al.  in 118 patients with SR.
The most interesting data of our study is the correlation between the number of LLRs and the risk to develop an SR. In fact, we observed that in patients with a single LLR as the first manifestation of venom allergy there is a risk, although low, of SR to a subsequent hymenoptera sting, while there is no risk of SR in presence of at least two previous consecutive LLRs.
These findings may be useful in practical management of patients sensitized to hymenoptera venom, especially concerning the prescription of epinephrine auto-injectors. Actually, patients with at least two LLRs to stings are unlikely to need an auto-injector because there is no apparent risk of SR, while in patients evaluated after a single LLR the risk of SR cannot be ruled out and the availability of epinephrine for auto-injection is worthwhile. However, only a prospective study with a prolonged follow-up on a large number of patients with LLRs to stings could definitely settle the issue.
SP conceived and designed the study. SD, TDP, and II performed the tests and obtained the data from patients, EM contributed to the manuscript preparation, CI analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors thank Mrs. Rosella Bindelli and Mrs. Maria Consuelo Fortuna for their valuable work in data collection.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Severino M, Bonadonna P, Passalacqua G. Large local reactions from stinging insects: from epidemiology to management. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9:334–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez J, Blanca M, Soriano V, Sanchez J, Juarez C. Epidemiological study of the prevalence of allergic reactions to Hymenoptera in a rural population in the Mediterranean area. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:1069–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Annila IT, Karjalainen ES, Annila PA, Kuusisto PA. Bee and wasp sting reactions in current beekeepers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;77:423–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Golden DB. Stinging insect allergy. Am Fam Phys. 2003;67:2541–6.Google Scholar
- Graft DF, Schuberth KC, Kagey-Sobotka A, Kwiterovich KA, Niv Y, Lichtenstein LM, et al. A prospective study of natural history of large local reactions after hymenoptera stings in children. J Pediatr. 1984;104:64–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mauriello PM, Barde SH, Georgitis JW, Reisman RE. Natural history of large local reactions from stinging insects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984;74:494–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Golden DB, Kagey-Sobotka A, Norman PS, Hamilton RG, Lichtenstein LM. Outcomes of allergy to insect stings in children with and without venom immunotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:668–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez J, Soriano V, Mayorga L, Mayor M. Natural history of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Eastern Spain. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:179–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mueller HL. Diagnosis and treatment of insect sensitivity. J Asthma Res. 1966;3:331–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green AW, Reisman RE, Arbesman CE. Clinical and immunologic studies of patients with large local reactions following insect stings. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1980;66:186–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hess DR. Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care. 2004;49:1171–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar