Open Access

Prevalence of positive atopy patch test in an unselected pediatric population

  • Nicola Fuiano1,
  • Giuliana Diddi1,
  • Maurizio Delvecchio2 and
  • Cristoforo Incorvaia C3Email author
Clinical and Molecular Allergy201513:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-015-0011-2

Received: 12 January 2015

Accepted: 11 March 2015

Published: 7 May 2015

The Erratum to this article has been published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy 2015 13:18

Abstract

Background

In the latest decades, epidemiological studies on allergic disorders in children, including atopic dermatitis, rhinitis and asthma, demonstrated a continuous increase in prevalence. However, such studies are usually performed by questionnaires and, sometimes, by skin prick test or in vitro IgE tests, while the portion of allergy sustained by the cell-mediated mechanism is neglected, because the essential test, i.e. the atopy patch test is not performed.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey studied by a specific questionnaire, skin prick test and atopy patch test, an unselected population, represented by the entire scholastic population attending a Primary school and a Junior Secondary school in the rural town of San Marco in Lamis, 12.000 inhabitants (Puglia, Italy).

Results

Among the 456 subjects included, 78 (17.1 %) had a positive skin prick test and 57 (12.5 %) had a positive atopy patch test. In particular, 13.4 % of subjects were positive only to skin prick test and 8.8 % were positive only to atopy patch test. The allergen most frequently positive was the house dust mite, with 41 positive results to skin prick test and 55 to atopy patch test, while for pollen positive results concerned almost exclusively the skin prick test.

Conclusions

This survey on an unselected population of children detected a prevalence of positive results to atopy patch test not so distant from the positive results to skin prick test, and in 8.8 % of subjects the atopy patch test was the only positive test. This would suggest to add the atopy patch test in future epidemiological studies on allergy, in order to avoid to overlook the not negligible portion of patients with T-cell-mediated allergy.

Keywords

AllergyAtopic dermatitisAsthmaRhinitisSkin prick testAtopy patch test

Introduction

The atopy patch test (APT) was introduced in the 1980s using the technique of the patch test, used for diagnosis of contact dermatitis, to test the T-cell mediated sensitization to food allergens and inhalant allergens in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) [1]. Recent research has shown that also in patients with respiratory diseases such as rhinitis and asthma the allergic symptoms may be sustained by T-cell mediated reactions as demonstrated by positive results to APT. Importantly, in patients with T-cell-mediated allergy the APT can be the only positive test [2-5]. These clinical data on the role of the APT are supported by evidence on the capacity of such test to reproduce the pathophysiologic events of AD. In particular, the application of the APT to skin of AD patients is followed by an influx of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells [6], being possible to detect, 24 hours after APT, a Th2 cytokine pattern, with a shift to a Th1 pattern, as occurs in chronic AD skin lesions, after 48 hours [7,8].

These capacities should suggest that the APT would be useful in epidemiologic studies on allergic diseases. Indeed, the prevalence of positive APT was evaluated only in studies on allergic subjects. In particular, a multicentric European survey on patients with AD found that APT to food and inhalant allergens was frequently positive, ranging from a maximum value of 39 % for house dust mites (HDM) to a minimum of 9 % for celery; of note, positive APT with negative skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE in serum for the respective allergen was seen in 17 % of the patients [9]. A very recent study performed the APT in children with eosinophilic esophagitis, with positive results in around 46 % of cases [10].

Instead, epidemiologic surveys on allergy in the general population commonly use questionnaires for symptoms, SPT and specific IgE measurement [11-13], but no study employing the APT is thus far available. We evaluated the prevalence of positive APT and SPT in an unselected population of subjects in pediatric age.

Methods

Patients

This cross-sectional study included the entire scholastic population attending a Primary school and a Junior Secondary school in a rural town in Southern Italy (San Marco in Lamis, 12.000 inhabitants, Puglia). During the 2009–2010 school year we recruited 459 pupils and students [246 males (53.6 %), 213 females (46.4 %), age range 7.3-13.9 years, mean age 10.8 ± 1.5 years; median age 11.0 years]

The study was approved by written informed consent from the Headmaster of the School and also from all the recruited subject’s parents.

Methods

We gave each and every one of the pupil’s parents a written questionnaire (WQ), consisting of 4 pages. This questionnaire had been introduced by Peroni et al. and used in previous epidemiological studies [12]. The WQ contained the three core ISAAC (International Study on Asthma and Allergy in Children) modules asking about the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, wheezing, and asthma [11] according to a precise diagnosis performed by a pediatrician or general practitioner or hospital doctor. In particular, the items of the questionnaire addressed the presence (either long-lasting or recent, i.e. in the last 12 months) of signs and symptoms of AD (eczema), rhinitis and asthma.

The questionnaire was delivered directly and personally to the parents to be filled in at home and returned when completed in a sealed envelope. After written and signed consent by the parents had been received, we submitted all the study subjects to SPT and APT using the most common aeroallergens in our geographic area: pollens (grasses, Parietaria, cypress, Compositae), house dust mites, cat epithelium, and Alternaria tenuis.

For SPT we used diagnostic material from Stallergenes (Antony, France), testing as negative control glicerosalin solution and as positive control histamine (10 mg/ml), according to the guidelines of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) [14]; the reactions were considered positive in the presence of a wheal diameter of at least 3 mm and larger than the negative control.

For APT, we used the diagnostic material from Chemotecnique (Wellinge, Sweden). The substance to be tested was applied onto intact skin of the lower back and held firmly in position using an adhesive patch test made up of an aluminum Finn chamber 8 mm in diameter, with an area of 50 mm2 and a volume of about 20 μl.

The application period was 48 h. The test was read no less than 30 min after removal to avoid margin effect. Results were interpreted according to the American Academy of Dermatology for APT, with a scale ranging from 1+ (weak reaction) to 3+ (strong reaction) [15]. Only reactions of 2+ and 3+ were considered positive for the purpose of the study. Table 1 shows the list and position of the allergens tested. The Finn Chamber with Petrolatum was used as the control test. We made sure that the families had been informed that they should avoid giving antihistamines to the children during the three-day period preceding the application of APT. We also advised them not to apply creams/ointments containing corticosteroids in the week before the test.
Table 1

Allergens used for APT

Position

Allergen

gr ± 10 %

1

Alternaria

0,085

2

Cat epithelium

0,086

3

Grass pollen

0,084

4

House dust mites (Dermatophagoides)

0,085

5

Compositae pollen

0,086

6

Cypress pollen

0,088

7

Parietaria pollen

0,088

8

Petrolatum control

0,085

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as percentages and as mean ± SD for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using χ 2 test for categorical variables. Contingency tables were used to analyze the association between the categorical variables and the tests used in the study (APT and SPT). Statistical significance was assumed for p < 0.05. The positive and negative predictive values were calculated as appropriate and the limits of the 95 % confidential interval displayed (CI95%).

Results

Of the 459 questionnaires delivered to the families, 456 (244 males, 212 females) were returned. Table 2 shows the clinical pictures according to age and gender obtained from the answers to the questionnaire.
Table 2

Distribution of the studied population according to the different clinical expressions of allergy as assessed by questionnaires

 

Atopic dermatitis

Rhinitis

Asthma/wheezing

subjects N°

66

109

66

males:females

43:23

66:43

36:30

age range (years)

7.8 – 13.2

7.8 – 13.2

8.2 – 13.3

mean age ± DS

10.9 ± 1.5

10.7 ± 1.6

11.3 ± 1.3

 

Ever

Last 12 months

Ever

Last 12 months

Ever

Last 12 months

subjects N° (%)

65

1

104

5

66

0

males: females

42:23

1:0

63:41

3:2

36:30

---

age range (years)

7.8 – 13.2

---

7.8 – 13.2

12.2 – 13.2

8.2 – 13.3

---

mean age ± DS

10.9 ± 1.5

---

10.7 ± 1.6

12.5 ± 0.4

11.3 ± 1.3

---

Of the 456 questionnaires returned, 279 (61.2 %) were negative for any sign or symptom, while 177 (38.8 %) were positive for symptoms of AD, rhinitis, or asthma/wheezing. In particular, 129 (28.3 %) were positive for only one kind of symptoms and 48 (10.5 %) were positive for more than one kind of symptoms. Overall, there were 66 questionnaires positive for AD, 109 for rhinitis, and 66 for asthma/wheezing. Most signs and symptoms were long-lasting, while only in 6 subjects the onset of signs and symptoms was in the last 12 months. In the 279 subjects with negative history, 29 (10.4 %) had a positive SPT and 26 (9.3 %) had a positive APT. In the 177 subjects with positive history, 49 (27.7 %) had a positive SPT and 31 (17.5 %) had a positive APT.

In the overall study population of 456 subjects, 78 (17.1 %) had a positive SPT and 57 (12.5 %) had a positive APT. In particular, 61 subjects (13.4 %) were positive only to SPT and 40 (8.8 %) were positive only to APT. The rate of positive test was significantly higher in males than in females both for SPT (22.1 % vs. 11.3 %, p = 0.002) and APT (15.6 % vs. 9 %, p = 0.033). No positive result to control tests occurred, both for glicerosalin solution in SPT and for petrolatum control for APT.

Figure 1 shows the results to APT and SPT according to the different clinical history. Significant differences were found for a higher rate of positive SPT concerning subjects with a history of asthma/wheezing ever, with a history of rhinitis ever, and with a negative history of AD ever. Table 3 shows the results to the single allergens tested. The allergen most frequently positive was the house dust mite, with 41 positive results to SPT and 55 to APT.
Figure 1

Rate of positive APT and positive SPT according to the history data.

Table 3

Results to APT and SPT for the single allergens tested

 

Positive SPT

Positive APT

Alternaria tenuis

8

0

Cypress pollen

29

0

Compositae pollen

4

2

Dermatophagoides

41

55

Cat epithelium

9

0

Grass pollen

28

3

Parietaria pollen

4

1

Discussion

Epidemiology is a powerful tool in investigating the importance of allergic diseases. Studies conducted lately have shown a continuous increase in the prevalence of allergy. In particular, the important ISAAC study focused on three major allergic diseases (asthma, rhinitis, and AD) and included a large number of countries worldwide. It detected in the Phase Three [16], which was completed a mean of 7 years after Phase One, an increased prevalence for at least one disorder. Increases were twice as common as decreases, and were more common in the 6–7 year age-group than in the 13–14 year age-group. For both age-groups, the majority of participating centres showed increases in all three disorders. All epidemiological surveys on allergy are based on questionnaires addressing the common symptoms of allergy and, quite often, on diagnostic tests such as SPT or specific IgE measurement. However, it is known since the classification by Coombs and Gell of the immunopathologic mechanisms [17] that the IgE-mediated mechanism drives a great part of allergies, but also other mechanisms are important. This was finally acknowledged in the Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization by Johansson et al. [18]. Among the different mechanisms, the T-cell-mediated one has long been recognized as decisive in AD, this attributing to the APT a significant diagnostic role, initially shown for sensitization to foods [19] but later also for sensitization to inhalant allergens and particularly to house dust mites [20,21]. The recent research further expanded the clinical importance of APT, based on the demonstration that this test is positive also in patients with respiratory allergy [3-5,22]. The fact that the APT may be the only positive test in patients with respiratory allergy underlines the importance of including this test in the diagnostic work-up of allergy. Otherwise, patients with negative results to SPT or in vitro IgE tests may be erroneously classified as nonallergic. Adding the APT allows us to achieve a correct diagnosis [23]. As far as the use of diagnostic tests in epidemiologic surveys is concerned, no studies using the APT are available other than those performed in populations of patients already known as allergic [9,10]. The present study shows that a positive APT is quite common in an unselected pediatric population, formed by all subjects attending Primary School and Junior Secondary School in a small Southern Italian town. Among the 456 subjects included in the survey, 17.1 % had a positive SPT and 12.5 % had a positive APT. The prevalence of positive SPT must be compared with epidemiological studies in the latest decade. In the European Community Respiratory Health Survey on adult subjects there was a wide variation in the prevalence of sensitization in the different countries, with a median between centres of 21.7 % for dust mite, 16.9 % for grass pollen, and 8.8 % for cat [24]. The recent study by Blomme et al. found in an unselected population in Ghent (Belgium), of age ranging from 3 to 86 years, an overall prevalence of positive SPT to common aeroallergens of 40.3 %, with a clinical diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in 30.9 % of cases. The peaks of prevalence were observed in the third and fourth decades of life, but also in pediatric age the prevalence of positive SPT was higher than 25 % [25]. The 17.1 % positive SPT rate we observed is lower, but the environment where our survey was performed may explain this difference. San Marco in Lamis is a small town of 12,000 inhabitants in a rural area, while Ghent, with around 245,000 inhabitants is Belgium's second largest municipality. A rural environment, like that of San Marco in Lamis, was found to be less favorable than urban areas for developing allergic diseases [26]. Analyzing only the subjects with symptoms, the rate of positive SPT was around 28 %. This value is comparable with data from previous studies on unselected populations of children [27,28], but is obviously much lower than observed in patients referring to specialists for allergological evaluation.

The findings on positive APT (9.3 %) in subjects with negative history and 17.5 % in subjects with positive history cannot be compared with previous epidemiological data, because there are no studies that limited the investigation to APT results to only inhalant allergens. However, we can confirm the observations from clinical studies [5,9,21] that APT may give positive results in concordance with SPT but may also be the only positive test (3.7 % and 8.8 % in the present study, respectively). The major role played by the house dust mite was also confirmed, with positive results accounting for 33.3 % of the overall positivity to SPT and to 91.1 % of the overall positivity to APT. Instead, in our study sensitization to pollens was almost exclusively IgE-mediated.

Conclusion

In this survey on an unselected population of children we observed a prevalence of positive results to APT not so distant from the positive results to SPT, especially concerning dust mites, and in 8.8 % of subjects the APT was the only positive test. This would suggest that by adding the APT in future epidemiological studies on allergy, would mean avoiding the not negligible portion of patients with T-cell-mediated allergy being overlooked.

Notes

Abbreviations

APT: 

Atopy patch test

AD: 

Atopic dermatitis

HDM: 

House dust mites

SPT: 

Skin prick test

WQ: 

Written questionnaire

ISAAC: 

International Study on Asthma and Allergy in Children

EAACI: 

European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Annamaria Limosani for her important contribution in terms of patience and tenacity and Laura Shearer for the English language revision.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pediatric Allergy Service, ASL FG Torremaggiore, I
(2)
UO “B Trambusti”, Children’s Hospital Giovanni XXIII
(3)
Allergy/Pulmonary Rehabilitation, ICP Hospital

References

  1. Ring J, Kunz B, Bieber T, Vieluf D, Przybilla B. The “atopy patch test” with aeroallergens in atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989;82:195.Google Scholar
  2. Wistokat-Wulfing A, Schmidt P, Darsow U, Ring J, Kapp A, Werfel T. Atopy patch test reactions are associated with T lymphocyte-mediated allergen-specific immune responses in atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:513–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuiano N, Incorvaia C. Comparison of skin prick test and atopy patch test with dust mite extracts in patients with respiratory symptoms or atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome. Allergy. 2003;58:828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Guler N, Kirerleli E, Tamay Z, Ones U. Atopy patch testing in children with asthma and rhinitis symptoms allergic to house dust mite. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006;17:346–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fuiano N, Incorvaia C, Prodam F, Procaccini DA, Bona G. Relationship between the atopy patch test and clinical expression of the disease in children with atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome and respiratory symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101:174–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kerschenlohr K, Decard S, Przybilla B, Wollenberg A. Atopy patch test reactions show a rapid influx of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDEC) in patients with extrinsic atopic dermatitis and patients with intrinsic atopic dermatitis patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:869–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sager N, Feldmann A, Schilling C, Kreitsch P, Neumann C. House dust mite-specific T cells in the skin of subjects with atopic dermatitis: frequency and lymphokine profile in the allergen patch test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;89:801–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. van Reijsen FC, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Kalthoff FS, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Westland JK, et al. Skin-derived aeroallergen-specific T-cell clones of the Th2 phenotype in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;90:184–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Darsow U, Laifaoui J, Kerschenlohr K, Wollenberg A, Przybilla B, Wüthrich B, et al. The prevalence of positive reactions in the atopy patch test with aeroallergens and food allergens in subjects with atopic eczema: a European multicenter study. Allergy. 2004;59:1318–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rezende ER, Barros CP, Ynoue LH, Santos AT, Pinto RM, Segundo GR. Clinical characteristics and sensitivity to food and inhalants among children with eosinophilic esophagitis. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR, Beasley R, Crane J, Martinez F, et al. International study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J. 1995;8:483–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Peroni DG, Piacentini GL, Bodini A, Boner AL. Preschool asthma in Italy: Prevalence, risk factors and health resource utilization. Resp Med. 2009;103:104–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Galassi C, De Sario M, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Chellini E, Ciccone G, et al. Changes in prevalence of asthma and allergies among children and adolescents in Italy: 1994–2002. Pediatrics. 2006;117:34–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dreborg S (ed): Skin tests used in type I allergy testing. Position paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 1989, 44 (supp 10): 1–59.Google Scholar
  15. Kanof NB. The American academy of dermatology patch test series for contact dermatitis. Int J Dermatol. 1977;16:827–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Asher MI, Montefort S, Bjorksten B, Lai CK, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, et al. ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. 2006;368:733–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Coombs RRA, Gell PGH. Clinical aspects of immunology, Chapter I. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1968.Google Scholar
  18. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use. Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:832–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Devillers AC, de Waard-van den Spek FB, Mulder PG, Oranje AP. Delayed- and immediate-type reactions in the atopy patch test with food allergens in young children with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009;20:53–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuiano N, Incorvaia C. Dissecting the causes of atopic dermatitis in children: less foods, more mites. Allergol Int. 2012;61:231–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuiano N, Fusilli S, Incorvaia C. House dust mite-related allergic diseases: role of the skin prick test, atopy patch test, and RAST in the diagnosis of different manifestations of allergy. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:819–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao J, Li LF. Atopy patch test to Dermatophagoides mix in a self-selected population in Beijing. Dermatitis. 2013;24:82–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Incorvaia C, Fuiano N, Canonica GW. Seeking allergy when it hides: which are the best fitting tests? World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6:11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bousquet PJ, Chinn S, Janson C, Kogevinas M, Burney P, Jarvis D. European Community Respiratory Health Survey I: Geographical variations in the prevalence of positive skin tests to environmental aeroallergens in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey I. Allergy. 2007;62:301–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Blomme K, Tomassen P, Lapeere H, Huvenne H, Bonny M, Acke F, et al. Prevalence of allergic sensitization versus allergic rhinitis symptoms in an unselected population. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;160:200–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. von Mutius E. Asthma and allergies in rural areas in Europe. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4:212–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sichletidis L, Chloros D, Tsiotsios I, Gioulekas D, Kyriazis G, Spyratos D, et al. The prevalence of allergic asthma and rhinitis in children of Polichni, Thessaloniki. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2004;32:59–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Peroni DG, Piacentini GL, Bodini A, Rigotti E, Pigozzi R, Boner AL. Prevalence and risk factors for atopic dermatitis in preschool children. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:539–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fuiano et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement