Skip to main content

Table 4 AR therapeutic management by the interviewed physicians

From: Physicians’ prescribing behaviour and clinical practice patterns for allergic rhinitis management in Italy

Item

Whole sample

Allergologists

ENTs

GPs

p-value

N = 2823

N = 909

N = 606

N = 1308

Main prescription drivers

< 0.001

 Effective on all AR symptoms

1533 (54.3%)

501 (55.1%)

335 (55.2%)

697 (53.2%)

 

 Quick symptom relief

1352 (47.8%)

429 (47.1%)

287 (47.3%)

636 (48.6%)

 

 Increased patient adherence

959 (33.9%)

255 (28%)

242 (39.9%)

462 (35.3%)

 

 Sustained efficacy

921 (32.6%)

307 (33.7%)

189 (31.1%)

425 (32.4%)

 

 Few/no side effects

911 (32.2%)

303 (33.3%)

164 (27%)

444 (33.9%)

 

 Effective with few drugs

849 (30%)

290 (31.9%)

198 (32.6%)

361 (27.5%)

 

 Easy to take

848 (30%)

228 (25%)

192 (31.6%)

428 (32.7%)

 

 Supported by scientific literature

470 (16.6%)

216 (23.7%)

127 (20.9%)

127 (9.7%)

 

 Affordable price

379 (13.4%)

137 (15%)

70 (11.5%)

172 (13.1%)

 

 Refundable

246 (8.7%)

60 (6.6%)

14 (2.3%)

172 (13.1%)

 

Follow-up timing

< 0.001

 < 12 months

86 (3%)

36 (4%)

24 (4%)

26 (2%)

 

 Every 12 months

1166 (41%)

427 (47%)

242 (40%)

497 (38%)

 

 Every 6 months

722 (26%)

272 (30%)

188 (31%)

262 (20%)

 

 < 6 months

865 (31%)

172 (19%)

157 (26%)

536 (41%)

 

Treatment regimen

< 0.001

 Monotherapy

1170 (41.4%)

303 (33.3%)

246 (40.5%)

621 (47.4%)

 

 Polytherapy

1653 (59.6%)

606 (66.7%)

360 (59.4%)

687 (52.5%)

 
  1. Data are expressed as number of patients (%). Chi squared test was used to investigate differences in the observed frequencies across specialty area